Kinston Building Supply Co. v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Based on specific exceptions in the record, defendant challenges the testimony of the witness Alice Fay Barwick regarding the account in question. The defendant contends the court erred in admitting testimony of the witness “without proper foundation, identification, authentication and time of preparation of the record of the account subject of this action.” We do not agree.
In 1 C. J.S., Account, Action on, § 16, p. 606, it is said:
“Any evidence, otherwise competent, which tends to show the existence or correctness of the account, or which tends to disprove its existence or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Horton v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Coppley v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- White v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Godwin Building Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978