Legal Opinion

Coppley v. Carter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1971No. 7122SC161PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is directed to the denial of his motion to strike the testimony of the defendant regarding the reasonableness of the defendant’s speed at the time he was attempting to pass, for that it was not responsive. This assignment of error is without merit as the record shows that the testimony was elicited by the plaintiff during cross-examination and came as a result of argument with the witness by the plaintiff and hence the unresponsiveness. Moreover, there is no showing of prejudice as the jury answered the issue of defendant’s negligence in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Horton v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Southeastern Motels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Wentz v. Unifi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Smith v. PassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Williford v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API