Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Reynolds

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1904No. 4,700PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Daviess Circuit Court; M. S. Hastings, Special Judge. Action by Samuel Reynolds against the Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

The appellee brought this action against the appellant to recover damages for injuries to his person sustained in a collision with one of appellant’s trains at a highway crossing in the city of Vincennes, Indiana. It was begun in the Knox Circuit Court, and tried in the Daviess Circuit Court on change of venue. Two trials were had. In the first the jury failed to agree, in the second they returned a verdict for the appellee in the sum of $750, upon which judgment was rendered over a motion for a new trial, which called in .question the sufficiency of the evidence, the legality of the verdict,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ga. Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MarkeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. ClemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Borinstein v. HansbroughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API