Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 12, 1986No. 09-85-138 CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

704 S.W.2d 575 (1986)

William Henry HOWARD, Jr., Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-85-138 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

February 12, 1986.

C. Haden Cribbs, Jr., Beaumont, for appellant.

John R. DeWitt, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Beaumont, for appellee.

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

The Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of intentionally and knowingly delivering, by an actual transfer, a controlled substance, Diazepam, in a quantity of less than 200 grams. The indictment set out June 30, 1984, as the date of the delivery. An enhancement paragraph alleged that the Appellant,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Dies; Concurrence · Burgess.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Graves v. M. Griffin O'Neil & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Germany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lenhard v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. In Re LevaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API