Legal Opinion
Barr v. Huitt
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 9, 1934No. 10027PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Justice.
This suit was brought by J. F. Huitt against J. J. Barr and his wife, Emma R. Barf, H. V. Barr, son of Mr. and Mrs. Barr, and.D. M. Green, to recover a balance 'due upon a promissory note for $2,009 of date March 3, 192S, signed by J. J. Barr, Emma R. Barr, D. M. Green, and H.- Y. Barr in the order named, payable to J. F. Huitt on the 3d day of March, 1930. Said note provides for the' 10 per cent, additional on principal. and interest then due as attorney’s fees, if placed in the hands- of an attorney for collection after maturity, or if suit is brought on it for collection.
Plain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Exum v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Waller v. Gorman Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commercial Inv. Co. of Uvalde v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Rau v. Modern Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Rogers v. Public Service Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Commercial Inv. Co. of Uvalde v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939