Legal Opinion

Rau v. Modern Sales & Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1967No. 14548PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Modern Sales & Service, Inc., against the defendants, Edward H. Merrick, Jr., and Bill Rau, jointly and severally, in a suit on a promissory note signed by Edward H. Merrick, Jr., and Bill Rau, payable to its order. The trial court also held that defendant Rau was not entitled to recover on his cross-action against defendant Merrick. Trial was by the court without a jury. Defendant Merrick did not prosecute an appeal.

The material findings of fact filed by the trial court were: That Bill Rau was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Benavides v. Laredo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Commercial Inv. Co. of Uvalde v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. MJR Corp. v. B & B VENDING CO., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Etc. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Garland v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Hatke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API