Legal Opinion

United States v. Thompson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 24, 1982No. ACM S25621PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted of multiple forgery allegations. The Government’s case rests principally on the testimony of a questioned documents examiner who testified the accused was the author of the forged instruments in question. The paramount issue before us is whether the military judge erred in allowing the accused’s handwriting exemplars to be used for analysis after it was established they were obtained without a warning under Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 831.

The accused concedes that United States v. Lloyd, 10 M.J. 172…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. Louis R. WolfishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. Samuel B. Lewis, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BledsoeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. ChandlerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API