Legal Opinion
Hazel Hill Canning Co. v. Roberts Bros.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the Superior 'Court of Baltimore City, ( Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
The appellant sued the appellees for an alleged breach of a contract, but a verdict was rendered for the appellees under instructions of the Court, and this appeal is, from the judgment entered thereon. The sale was by Henry Zoller & Co., merchandise brokers, and the following memorandum was made:
“Baltimore, Md., June 19, 1913.
“Sold for account of the Hazel Hill Canning Oo., Inc., Fredericksburg, Ya., to Messrs. Roberts Bros., Balto., Md., 5,000 Cases Standard Ho. 3 Tomatoes, ‘Merry Mill’ Brand, at 80c. per dozen f. o. b. Fredericksburg, Ya., 1913 Packing, to be shipped during the packing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- McGrath v. GegnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Donley v. . Glens Falls Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Samuel M. Lawder & Sons Co. v. AlBert MacKie Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ten Broeck Tyre Co. v. Rubber Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Finkelstein v. MorgansternCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Roberts v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923