Legal Opinion
Hoover v. BOONE OPERATING, INC.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 2012No. 109,015. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4Published
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH RAPP, Judge.
11 Doyle Hoover (Hoover) and Jim Ho-grefe (Hogrefe), the respondents before the Oklahoma Corporation Commission en bane (OCC), appeal the Interim Order of the OCC finding them to be primarily responsible for plugging certain oil wells and the OCC applicant, Boone Operating, Inc. (Boone), secondarily responsible for such plugging operations. Boone did not appeal.
BACKGROUND
1 2 Hoover acquired the surface ownership of a tract of land. Boone operated several oil wells situated on the property. Based upon his observations of the condition of the well equipment, Hoover believed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. Professional Practices CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Henry v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Oklahoma Water Resources Bd. v. Texas County Irrigation and Water Resources Assn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Smith v. New Hampshire Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.