Legal Opinion

Roszek v. Bauerle & Stark Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1918No. 11744PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Appellant, Aloizy Roszek, (hereafter called plaintiff,) by his father as next friend, brought suit against appellee, the Bauerle & Stark Company, (hereafter called defendant,) in the superior court of Cook county. The declaration alleged the defendant on March 2, 1914, was engaged in the manufacture of sewing machines and in the prosecution of such business was operating sand-paper machines, with rollers and gears; that plaintiff on such date was fifteen years of age and contrary to the statute was employed by defendant to work at and about such a machine, and that while so woi'king…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Car & Foundry Co. v. ArmentrautIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Stetz v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Foth v. Macomber & Whyte Rope Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Indian Hill Club v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. Petersen Beverage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. In re StonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API