Legal Opinion
Gasperini v. Manginelli
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
Defendant moves. (1) to strike out the complaint as sham and frivolous, (2) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that one of the plaintiffs has not legal capacity to sue, (3) to dismiss the complaint as legally insufficient with respect to each *549cause of action, and (4) to require the plaintiffs “ to make the complaint more definite and certain and to separately state and number the allegations thereof ”.
In addition to the relief sought in the notice of motion, defendant, in his brief, claims that there has been an improper joinder of parties. Suffice it to say that there is no merit to this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Ashcroft v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Wainwright & Page, Inc. v. Burr & McAuley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cabin v. Community Newspapers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re CienaNew York Court of Claims · 1958
- Glens Falls Insurance v. RussoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1975
- New York City Housing Authority v. PenaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953