Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Insurance v. Russo

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 24, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton M. Z. Lynn, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action to recover insurance premiums. Pursuant to CPLR 2214 (subd [b]) the notice of motion demanded that answering affidavits, if any, be served five days before the return date.

The attorney for the defendant not only disregarded the demand, but also disregarded the requirement of CPLR 2214 (subd [b]) that even absent such a demand, answering affidavits are required to be served at least two days before the return date. Worse than that, the attorney for the defendant even refrained from delivering the answering affidavit to the plaintiff’s counsel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallin v. WallinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Gasperini v. ManginelliNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Security Mutual Life Insurance v. DanzilioNew York Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StilwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Fort Tryon Nursing Home v. KavanaghNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API