Legal Opinion
Wainwright & Page, Inc. v. Burr & McAuley, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1936PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
The complaint herein is attacked under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for insufficiency. Among other facts, it alleges that the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the real estate brokerage business, introduced to the defendant Burr a certain Mr. and Mrs. Gordon B. Scott; that the introduction was made because of the plaintiff’s acquaintance with and reliance upon Burr, and with the purpose and intent, known to Burr, that she should perform brokerage services for the Scotts and thereby earn commissions for such services; that Burr was associated with MacDonald, Inc., a corporation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Emery v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Milliken v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Peterson v. EighmieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by41 opinions
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Zalkind v. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Quadrozzi Concrete Corp. v. MastroianniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Cuglar v. Power AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1957
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.