Legal Opinion

City Savings Bank v. Carlon

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1910No. 16,583PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Alexander C. Troup, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The injury complained of in this case occurred in September, 1903. It was alleged that an old cistern on the property occupied by the bank had been filled, and the work was so carelessly and negligently done by the bank that, while Mrs. Carlon was passing on the walk that had been laid over the cistern, the walk gave way and she was injured. The case has been several times tried to a jury, and this is the third time it has appeared in this court. Carlon v. City Savings Bank, 82 Neb. 582, 85 Neb. 659. Upon the last jury trial in the lower court, Mrs. Carlon had a substantial judgment against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carlon v. City Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Carlon v. City Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. Griffin v. GassNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. O'HareNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Blaha v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API