Legal Opinion

Carlon v. City Savings Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1908No. 15,335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Lee ¡8. Estelle, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

The petition in this case charges that the defendant was the owner of a certain lot in the city of Omaha, and that her husband had rented the premises and was in possession of same as a tenant. It further charges that there was a cistern on the lot, located between the dwelling-house and an outhouse; that a board sidewalk extending from the rear of the dwelling to the outhouse covered the cistern; that the existence of the cistern was unknown to the plaintiff until some ‘time in March, 1903; that she immediately notified the hank, and it caused the cistern to be filled with frozen…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. City Savings Bank v. CarlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kimmons v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Mahan Jellico Coal Co. v. DullingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Carlon v. City Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Carlon v. City Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API