Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1942No. 31433PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This original proceeding in quo warranto was instituted by the attorney general of the state of Nebraska in conformity with the direction of the Chief Executive, to “determine *115by what warrant” the “Consumers Public Power District,” respondent herein, “exercises possession, ownership and control of all and singular and any part or portion of the interconnected and integrated electric system known as the Western Division of the Western Public Service Company,” and as described in the amended information filed herein “and any part or portion thereof, located within the boundaries of any…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. State ex rel. First National Bank v. BartleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Marrow v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. Standard Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Leese v. Atchison & Nebraska RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. DeyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Roy v. BLADEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. R-31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pulliam v. McCleneghanNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Blitzkie v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API