Legal Opinion

In Re Hurd-Marvin Drain

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1951No. 28, Calendar No. 45,210PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

331 Mich. 504 (1951)

50 N.W.2d 143

In re HURD-MARVIN DRAIN.

MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

JACKSON COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER.

Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 45,210.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 3, 1951.

McKone, Badgley, McInally & Kendall and George H. Wyatt (J.J. Danhof, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Robert Crary and Robert Crary, Jr., for defendants.

CARR, J.

The general drain law of the State[*] provides for locating, constructing and maintaining drains when conducive to the public health, convenience and welfare. Chapter 7 of the law (CL 1948, § 267.1 et seq. [Stat Ann and Stat Ann…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. KANS. CITY SO. RY. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Road Improvement District Number 6 of Little RiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Thomas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Book-Gilbert v. GreenleafMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Menard Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API