Legal Opinion
Cabardo v. Patacsil
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2022No. 2:12-cv-01705Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH CABARDO, et al., No. 2:12-cv-01705-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARILYN PATACSIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Joseph Cabardo, Donnabel Suyat, Mactabe 18 Bibat, Marissa Bibat, Alicia Bolling, Renato Manipon, Carlina Cabacongan, and John Dave 19 Cabacongan’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (ECF No. 253.) 20 Defendants Marilyn Patacsil and Ernesto Patacsil (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. 21 (ECF No. 256.)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.