Legal Opinion

Yousuf, Bashe Abdi v. Samantar, Mohamed

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 16, 2006No. 05-5197PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GINSBURG, Chief Judge.

The drafters of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure believed Rule 45 was “so simple that it did not need any discussion” at the symposia they held to introduce the Rules in 1938. American Bar Association, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Proceedings of the [American Bar Association] Institute [on Federal Rules] at Washington, D.C. and of the Symposium at New York City 313 (Edward H. Hammond ed.) (1939). The dispute before us today, in which plaintiff Bashe Abdi Yousuf and others challenge the district court’s denial of their motion to compel compliance with a subpoena…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Lippoldt v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Chaunte Ott v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. KramerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API