Legal Opinion
In Re Montry
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided September 11, 2008No. 18-06080PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JERRY W. VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Section 1325(a) of the Bankruptcy Code states that “the court shall confirm a [Chapter 13] plan if ... (3) the plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law.” 1 In the motion to deny confirmation now before the Court, the Chapter 13 trustee contends that the Debtors’ plan has not been proposed in good faith, and therefore confirmation of the plan should be denied, because its apparent purpose is to provide solely for the payment over time of the attorney’s fees associated with the Debtors’ bankruptcy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re PaleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- In Re RushUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. Lepe (In Re Lepe)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re WarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- In Re BuckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- In Re ArlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2011
- In Re ClevengerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.