Legal Opinion
In Re Clevenger
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided November 2, 2009No. 18-43224PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF THIRD AMENDED CHAPTER IS PLAN
ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors Ronald and Carol Clevenger seek to amend their confirmed Chapter 13 plan based on changed circumstances, proposing to decrease plan payments, shorten the duration of the plan, and reduce the distribution to unsecured creditors to zero. They assert that the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) regarding applicable commitment period and projected disposable income do not apply to amended plans under 11 U.S.C. § 1329. The Chapter 13 Trustee moved to deny confirmation of the proposed amendment.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Education Assistance Corporation v. William Wesley ZellnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Gregory A. Lemaire, Debtor. Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. LemaireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re GrutschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- In Re HutchisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2011
- In Re SavageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- In re HopperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012
- In Re BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.