Legal Opinion

Crystal Gale Thurston v. The MacKe Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1983No. 83-1090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court held that the Virginia Workmen’s Compensation Act, Va.Code § 65.1-1, et seq., does not imply a cause of action in favor of a discharged employee against his employer who has discharged that employee because of the employee’s assertion of a claim under the Act. We affirm.

That same district court (Judge Williams) had previously held that such a cause of action is not implied in Blevins v. General Electric Co., 491 F.Supp. 521 (W.D.Va.1980), and we give some weight to the decisions of trial judges sitting in a State and familiar with the local law and its trends. E.g., Peacock…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dockery v. Lampart Table Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Cassius L. Peacock, Jr. v. Retail Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Raley v. Darling Shop of Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Blevins v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Bergen Brunswig Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  2. Johnson v. S. E. Nichols, Inc.Rockingham County Circuit Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API