Legal Opinion

Dockery v. Lampart Table Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1978No. 7718SC500PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The sole question before us is whether the plaintiff’s complaint sets forth a claim upon which relief can be granted and was, therefore, improperly dismissed. As the defendant made the motion to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the allegations of the complaint must be taken as true for purposes of this appeal. Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 289 N.C. 71, 80, 221 S.E. 2d 282, 288, 79 A.L.R. 3d 651, 662 (1976); Mazzucco v. Board of Medical Examiners, 31 N.C. App. 47, 50, 228 S.E. 2d 529, 532, appeal dismissed,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API