Legal Opinion
Winkelman v. Parma City School District
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 2, 2005No. 1:04CV1329PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On March 2, 2005, Plaintiffs, Jeff, Sandee, and Jacob Winkelman (collectively, the “Winkelmans”) filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on the Administrative Record. 1 (Docket No. 35.) On March 17, 2005, Parma City School District (“Parma”) filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on the Administrative Record. (Docket No. 38.) The issue on appeal is whether or not Parma provided Jacob Winkelman with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) 2 as mandated under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- John Doe, a Minor, by and Through His Parent and Next Friend, Mary Doe v. ICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Doe v. Board Education Tullahoma City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Nack Ex Rel. Alice Nack v. Orange City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Nack v. Orange City SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006