Legal Opinion

In re of S.M.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1986No. 15093PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Acting Justice.

The parents of S.M. appeal from the trial court’s order which terminated their parental rights. We affirm.

B.M. the mother, and C.M. the father, both of whom are appellants herein, are the parents of three daughters. The M.’s children are all named S.M. The oldest daughter was born on March 22, 1982. The middle daughter, and the only child concerned in this appeal, was born on March 12, 1983. The last daughter was born on May 29, 1984.

S.M. was born seven weeks premature on March 12, 1983. B.M. delivered the child through an emergency cesarean section operation. S.M.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In re N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In re R. Z. F.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Matter of SSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People in Interest of THSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In the Interest of A.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People in Interest of KCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re the Dependency & Neglect of C.L.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In re S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API