Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence Orlando, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2004No. 02-6107PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant-Appellant, Lawrence Orlando, Sr., was convicted by a jury for Conspiracy to Use Mail and Facilities in Interstate Commerce in Aid of Racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). After sentencing, defendant appealed his sentence and conviction to this Court. This Court remanded his case for resentencing to determine the amount of laundered funds for which defendant should be held accountable. United States v. Orlando, 281 F.3d 586 (6th Cir.2002). On remand,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Toufic S. Nagi (89-2130) Robert F. Barash (89-2140) and Richard Weaver (89-2131)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Anastasios S. KatzopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Ahmed BrikaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API