Legal Opinion
United States v. Toufic S. Nagi (89-2130) Robert F. Barash (89-2140) and Richard Weaver (89-2131)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1992No. 89-2130, 89-2140 and 89-2131PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Toufic Nagi, Robert Barash, and Richard Weaver, appeal their sentences arising from their convictions for conducting a continuing criminal enterprise, and for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 848. The issues on appeal are:
Whether the district court committed reversible error in calculating Nagi’s and Barash’s sentences using the Sentencing Guidelines which became effective after the alleged conspiracy had ended; and Whether the district court correctly found that Weaver was not a minor participant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Charles PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lester Sloman (89-4056), Paul Bauer (89-4057)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Riyaid SwidanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Francis A. KoeberleinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Toufic Nagi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Joe W. Fountain (92-1507) Carlton B. McEaddy (92-1866)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Alberto Gessa, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.