Legal Opinion

Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 24, 2008No. Civil Action No. 08-2063-KHVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Roxie Sibley, Jeanne Noel, Ernesto Bennett, Jamie Williams, Greg St. Ju-lien, Trade Hernandez, John Jasinski, Jay Richie and Teisha King bring putative class action claims for unpaid commissions against Sprint Nextel Corporation and SprinVUnited Management Company. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that defendants are liable for violation of the Kansas Wage Payment Act (“KWPA”), K.S.A. § 44-313 et seq. (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), quantum meruit (Count III), promissory estoppel (Count IV) and unjust enrichment (Count…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  2. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
  3. Huddleson v. City of PuebloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  4. Eatinger v. BP America Production Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  5. Bennett v. Sprint Nextel Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API