Legal Opinion
In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 19, 2012No. MDL No. 1840; No. 07-2053-KHVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*600 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in Wilson v. Ampride, Inc., 06-2582-KHV (D.Kan.) and American Fiber & Cabling, LLC v. BP Products North America Inc., 07-2053-KHV (D.Kan.) bring class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against defendants which either own, operate or control gas stations in Kansas. Plaintiffs claim that because defendants sell motor fuel for a specified price per gallon without disclosing or adjusting for temperature expansion, they are liable under Kansas law for unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy and violating the Kansas…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Hernandez v. PistotnikCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Montano v. First Light Federal Credit Union (In re Montano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Maak v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.