Legal Opinion
Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 12, 1969No. 64 Civil 1222PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Interesting questions relating to the scope and applicability of the attorney-client and work-product privileges are raised by the instant motion made by the defendant United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc. (UMM).
Pursuant to the agreement of counsel and the Court’s ruling of February 24, 1969 (Transcript of Hearing, February 24, 1969, at 2-3), this motion is deemed one made under Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(e) (2) —objections to the report of the Special Master, filed on February 4, 1969. The following facts will facilitate understanding of the procedural genesis of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Vilastor-Kent Theatre Corp. v. BrandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.