Legal Opinion

Beenken v. Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided December 19, 1973No. 72-C-46-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McMANUS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Company’s resisted motion for their dismissal as defendants, filed November 13, 1973.

Defendant Trustees’ motion for dismissal is apparently based on the defense provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In general, the court has broad discretion in ruling on a motion to dismiss, Nayer v. Robertshaw-Fulton Controls Co., 195 F.Supp. 704 (D.C., 1961), but dismissal should only be granted with care in order to avoid improperly denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Nayer v. Robertshaw-Fulton Controls Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
  4. Music v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Gant v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Innovative Digital Equipment, Inc. v. Quantum Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Bankord v. DeRockDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1976
  3. Cohen v. McAllisterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Pearson v. Columbus and Greenville Ry.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
  5. CEI Enterprises, Inc. v. Professional Coating Technologies, IncDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API