Legal Opinion

Innovative Digital Equipment, Inc. v. Quantum Technology, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 19, 1984No. C83-3675PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER .

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). For the reasons outlined below, this Court denies Defendants’ Motion. In addition, Defendants’ Motion for More Definite Statement is denied.

I

On September 9, 1983, Plaintiff Innovative Digital Equipment Inc. (“IDE”), an Ohio corporation, filed suit against Defendants Quantum Technology, Inc. (“Quantum”), a Michigan corporation, and Defendant Alfred C. Manfroni (“Manfroni”), a resident of the state of Michigan. IDE sells computer…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brian Dale Bramlet v. James A. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. William L. O'Brien v. Robert J. DigraziaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  5. Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dayton Superior Corp. v. YanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. Federal Insurance v. WebneDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Tinder v. Lewis County Nursing Home Dist.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001
  5. Crosby v. America Online, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API