Cheek v. Eye
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Craig County; A. C. Brewster, Judge. Actions by Floyd Cheek and Martin Mitsler and others against Vlrey G. Bye' and others, consolidated. Judgment for de-. fendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This action was commenced by Floyd C. Cheek against Ulrey O. Eye, Ed. Hicks, Preston Proctor, and Hil-dred Womack. The plaintiff alleges that he is the duly elected, qualified school district clerk of school district 45, Craig county, and the defendants are claiming to be school district clerk and members of said school board, respectively; and that Hil-dred Womack is county superintendent; and that said defendants nor any of them are residents of said school district, but are usurping tbe office and entering into the offices of said school district 45, and are unlawfully usurping the rights…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Paine v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Albach v. Fraternal Aid UnionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- State ex rel. Wah-We-Yea-Cumin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wagoner County Election Board v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Mitsler v. EyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- State ex rel. Board of Regents v. McCloskey Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Hendricks v. School Dist. No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Huffman v. School Board of Independent Consolidated School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.