Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Massinari

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-3154PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PADOVA, District Judge.

This matter arises on named Plaintiff Richard Duffy’s Motion to Certify Class. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the Motion and certifies the class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2).1

I. Background

This case involves an age discrimination claim against the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) and the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”). Named Plaintiff Richard Duffy claims that he, along with approximately 129 other prospective class members, were discriminated against on the basis of age when, in the process of restructuring its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oslan v. Collection Bureau of Hudson ValleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Lewis v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Kerrigan v. Philadelphia Board of ElectionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API