Legal Opinion

Oslan v. Collection Bureau of Hudson Valley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2002No. Civ.A. No. 01-2173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEM10RANDUM AND ORDER

SCHILLER, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Before this court is a motion to certify a class action against defendant Collection Bureau of Hudson Valley (“CBHV”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

According to the complaint, CBHV is in the business of collecting debts. On May 19, 2000, defendant sent to Ms. Oslan a collection or “dunning” letter which attempted to coerce the plaintiff into paying debts which she owed to First Consumers National Bank. The letter read, in part:

TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO HELP RESTORE YOUR CREDIT, SEND 75%…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perry v. Fleetboston Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Barel v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. McCall v. Drive Financial Services, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Albanese v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Blandina v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API