Legal Opinion
Kerrigan v. Philadelphia Board of Election
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 2008No. Civil Action No. 07-687PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PADOVA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, individuals with mobility disabilities who are registered to vote in the City of Philadelphia, have brought this action against the Philadelphia Board of Elections and the Commissioners of the City of Philadelphia in charge of elections, alleging that Defendants have violated their civil rights under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131-12134, and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (the “RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), by denying them equal and integrated access to neighborhood polling places in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Margaret L. Johnston v. Hbo Film Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LIBERTY RESOURCES, INC. v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- SCANLAN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021