Legal Opinion

St. Bernard Cypress Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1933No. 6668,PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal, like that in Guste v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 115, attacks a spillway condemnation award. The proceedings were conducted under the authority of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 USCA § 702a et seq.). Section 4 of the act (33 USCA § 702d), authorizing the Secretary of War to cause condemnation proceedings to be instituted, provides: “In all such proceedings the court, for the purpose of ascertaining the value of the property and assessing the compensation to be paid, shall appoint three commissioners, whose award, when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. RudolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Guste v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. Certain Land Situate in Wayne CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1941
  3. United States v. Certain Lands in Town of HighlandsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. United States v. 80.46 AcresDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944
  5. United States v. 2,095 Acres of LandDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API