Legal Opinion
Searles v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 4, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4175PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Chief Judge.
In this appeal we must determine if A.R.S. § 12-2402(A)(2) [ex parte prejudgment seizures] is constitutional as drafted and as applied to the facts of this case.
In October of 1976, the First National Bank of Arizona filed a Complaint and Application for Issuance of Provisional Remedy in the Maricopa County Superior Court. The Bank sought recovery of the amounts due and owing under the terms of a security agreement executed by appellants and assigned to the Bank at the time appellants purchased a mobile home. The Bank also sought immediate possession of the mobile home…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wallace v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992