Legal Opinion

City of Mingo Junction v. Sheline

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1935No. 25204PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In finding that tbe trial court erred in excluding “Exhibit A,” tbe appellate court in its opinion said:

“This court is inclined to think, although tbe proposed motion was not read into tbe record, that this testimony should have been received; * * *.
“This court is of the opinion that if the interest of the plaintiff had been preserved and protected, especially by a proper offering of this testimony and preservation of exception thereto, that the plaintiff should have had the benefit of such testimony so offered.” This exhibit was offered by the plaintiff for the purpose of showing that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Harris v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Akron (City) v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  5. City of Cleveland v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ChapinOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Allen Freight Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API