Legal Opinion
Allen Freight Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1992No. 91-512PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The first issue presented is whether R.C. 5577.05 absolves the appellants from a duty to provide clearance for maximum-height vehicles under the bridge. R.C. 5577.05 states:
“No vehicle shall be operated upon the public highways, streets, bridges, and culverts within the state, whose dimensions exceed those specified in this section.
U * * *
“(C) No such vehicle shall have a height in excess of thirteen feet six inches, with or without load.
tt * * *
“This section does not require the state, a municipal corporation, county, township, or any railroad or other private corporation to provide…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Rothfuss v. Hamilton Masonic Temple Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Mingo Junction v. ShelineOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stewart v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kramer v. Angel's Path, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- White v. Smith & Wesson Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.