United States v. Czeschin
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceSullivan, Senior Judge
Appellant, who gave a false, sworn, written statement to criminal investigators after he waived his statutory rights against self-in*350crimination, can be prosecuted for making a false official statement in violation of Article 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice. United States v. Prater, 32 MJ 433, 438 (CMA 1991); see United States v. Solis, 46 MJ 31, 36 (1997) (Sullivan, J., concurring in the result).
One need not speculate on the “drafting history” of the Manual for Courts-Martial to reach this position. In United States v. Prater, supra, this Court clearly stated, “[Statements to military…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. DorseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. FrazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. GayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.