Legal Opinion
WelCom Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 27, 2012No. Consol. 11-00370PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
In this case, the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”) found that one model of hand truck was within the scope of an antidumping order while two others were not. Plaintiff claims that Commerce erred in finding the one model within scope because it previously found that similar models were outside the scope of the order, while defendant-intervenors claim that Commerce erred by finding the two other models outside scope. The government defends Commerce’s actions on both counts. For the reasons explained below, plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Transactive Corporation v. United States of America and Robert E. Rubin, Secretary of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Appleton Papers Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- SolarWorld Americas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.