Legal Opinion

Taylor v. New System Prosthetic Dental Laboratory, Inc.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided May 27, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahon, J.

This action is one brought by the plaintiffs as dentists, for themselves and on behalf of all other members of the dental profession and’ the public generally, against the defendants to restrain them from violating the dental code of the state of Ohio, being Sections 1314 to 1333, inclusive, of the General Code of Ohio.

The plaintiffs in their petition allege that the defendant, the New System Prosthetic Dental Laboratory, Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio on or about the 10th day of October, 1930, alleging the existence of the dental code above referred to,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. People v. MaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. People v. WitteIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Abrams v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burden v. HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Burden v. HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API