Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Banning

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1942No. A-10150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

Petitioner filed in this court on the ll'th day of October, 1941, his petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was unlawfully imprisoned and illegally deprived of his1 liberty in the State Penitentiary at McAlester. He alleged that he was sentenced to the penitentiary from Oklahoma county in January, 1931, for a period of 10 years for the “larceny of an automobile.” That he entered a plea of guilty with an agreement with the county attorney that he would recommend a sentence of five years, and that such sentence would be suspended. That the court refused to follow the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re McNaughtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Ex Parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Ex Parte TollisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Ex Parte HollingsheadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Ex Parte VanderburgCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallaceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Ex Parte CameronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Ex Parte HummingbirdCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Roe v. BurfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API