Baugh v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
Harry Baugh was arrested for driving while intoxicated on a street whose center lane is the border of two counties. He contends that the statute allowing for a trial in either county is unconstitutional because he drove on only one side of the road and has a right to be tried in the county where the crime occurred. We hold that dangerous driving on a highway creates risk on all lanes of the highway, and invades interests of both counties in the case of a road that forms their common border. Therefore venue in either county was proper.
Factual and Procedural Background
Just after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GerschofferIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Cutter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Alkhalidi v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MolesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wurster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Neff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Osborne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Eberle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Timothy H. Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.