Legal Opinion

Baugh v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2004No. 29S02-0301-CR-22PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Harry Baugh was arrested for driving while intoxicated on a street whose center lane is the border of two counties. He contends that the statute allowing for a trial in either county is unconstitutional because he drove on only one side of the road and has a right to be tried in the county where the crime occurred. We hold that dangerous driving on a highway creates risk on all lanes of the highway, and invades interests of both counties in the case of a road that forms their common border. Therefore venue in either county was proper.

Factual and Procedural Background

Just after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GerschofferIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cutter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Alkhalidi v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. MolesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Wurster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Neff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Osborne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Eberle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Timothy H. Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API