Legal Opinion
State v. Moles
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1975No. 3-1273A170, 3-1273A171, 3-1273A172, 3-374A48PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStaton, P.J.
The trial court granted Cifaldi, Moles, and Pavlovich’s motions to quash the State’s indictment which alleged that they had violated the Indiana Adjusted Gross Income Tax Act. The State’s appeal from the granting of these motions in three different criminal actions is consoli dated. Since State v. Ward presents the same question on appeal, it too is consolidated for the purpose of this opinion. Ind. Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 5(B).
Besides the granting of the motion to quash issue above, the State’s appeal includes one additional issue: Was the State prejudiced by the denial of its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Economy Oil Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Wedmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Bradberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dolan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mickey Cundiff v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.