Legal Opinion

Scott v. Federal Land Bank of Louisville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1931No. 13,879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Appellee, The Federal Land Bank of Louisville, brought this action against Charles B. Ernestes, Gertrude M. Ernestes, his wife, James D. Scott and Olive J. Scott, his wife, Andrew Hahn and Charles D. Glick to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate situ ated in Decatúr County. The complaint also asked for a personal judgment against the defendants. It also averred that Olive J. Scott had no interest in the real estate in question. James D. Scott demurred to the complaint on the ground that neither the complaint nor the exhibit filed therewith contained a promise or contract by him (Scott)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunch v. GraveIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WalstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Klippel v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Federal Land Bank v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Federal Land Bank v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Federal Land Bank of Louisville v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. MulkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API