Legal Opinion

Sprenger, for Use v. Litten

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1940No. Appeal, 237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hirt, J.,

Opinion by

The note given by defendant to Joseph G. Sprenger on November 12, 1936 for $1,109 was later assigned to use plaintiff and judgment was entered thereon. It authorized the entry of judgment before maturity and, therefore, was not a negotiable instrument. Gimbel Bros. Inc. v. Hand, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 212. The note was originally given in accordance with a written agreement, executed on the same date, as part consideration for the purchase by defendant from Joseph G. Sprenger, of 25 shares of stock of Aleo Vault Company. The sales agreement also required the payment of $1,120…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Piper v. QueeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Warren Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Bauer v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Killeen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Shapiro v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Freeman v. LawtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Pronzato v. GuerrinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Shinn v. StemlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Fidelity Trust Co. v. GardinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Associates Discount Corp. v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API