Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanford

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 7, 2010No. Criminal Action H-09-342-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Robert Allen Stanford’s Motion for Release from Detention or Dismissal of the Indictment Based on Violations of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines the motion should be denied.

BACKGROUND

On June 18, 2009, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Texas returned a twenty-one count indictment against Defendant Robert Allen Stanford (“Stanford”), Chairman…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. Eric Millan and Ralph RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Hector Acevedo-RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. StanfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. United States v. StanfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API