United States v. Stanford
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FOR PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION
DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Relief and Medical Treatment (Document No. 397). Having considered the motion, testimony and oral argument presented during a hearing held on January 6, 2011, and the applicable law, the Court determines the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On June 18, 2009, a federal grand jury for the Southern District of Texas returned a twenty-one count indictment charging Defendant Robert Allen Stanford (“Stanford”) and others with, inter…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. SpauldingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Garcia v. A. BoncherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018