Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanford

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 26, 2011No. Criminal Action H-09-342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FOR PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION

DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Relief and Medical Treatment (Document No. 397). Having considered the motion, testimony and oral argument presented during a hearing held on January 6, 2011, and the applicable law, the Court determines the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

On June 18, 2009, a federal grand jury for the Southern District of Texas returned a twenty-one count indictment charging Defendant Robert Allen Stanford (“Stanford”) and others with, inter…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. SpauldingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Garcia v. A. BoncherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API